Thorogood English

Blog

  • How to Prepare Your Child for Online Learning: A Practical Guide

    Online learning has become a normal part of many children’s education — but it’s not quite the same as sitting in a classroom, and children who flourish in it aren’t simply those who happen to adapt naturally. With a little preparation, almost any child can get as much from an online lesson as from a face-to-face one. Here’s what parents can do.

    Create a Dedicated Learning Space

    The single most impactful thing you can do is give your child a consistent, distraction-free place to learn. This doesn’t need to be a home office — a cleared kitchen table, a bedroom desk, or even a corner of the living room works fine. What matters is that it’s consistently used for learning, and that during online sessions it doesn’t double as the place where younger siblings are playing or where the TV is on.

    Good lighting (facing a window, not backlit by one) and a stable internet connection are worth prioritising. Frozen video and choppy audio are genuinely disruptive to learning, not just mildly annoying.

    Sort the Technology in Advance

    Before the first session:

    • Test the video platform your tutor uses (Zoom, Google Meet, Teams) — ideally do a brief test call
    • Check that your child’s microphone works clearly and that their camera shows their face, not the ceiling
    • Have a backup plan for poor internet — a phone hotspot, or a prearranged way of rescheduling if connection drops entirely

    Technology problems at the start of a session eat into learning time and are stressful for everyone. A twenty-minute check the day before avoids most of them.

    Build the Habit of Camera On

    Children who learn with their camera off are less engaged — and good tutors teach differently when they can see their students. Encourage your child to have their camera on from the start. It becomes normal quickly, and the quality of the session improves noticeably when the tutor can see whether a student is confused, distracted, or has understood.

    Reduce Background Distractions

    Other devices are the biggest distraction during online sessions. Phones should be in another room or face-down and silenced. Social media notifications should be off. If your child is on a laptop, other tabs should be closed. This isn’t about distrust — it’s about helping them build the focus habits that will serve them in any learning context.

    Talk About What Online Learning Is Like

    Children who’ve never done online learning sometimes feel awkward in the first session — the dynamic is unfamiliar, it can feel strange to talk to a screen, and the social cues are slightly different. A quick conversation beforehand (“It might feel a bit different at first — that’s normal, it gets easier”) normalises the strangeness and reduces first-session anxiety.

    Also reassure them that it’s completely fine to say “I don’t understand” or “could you explain that again?” online — perhaps more fine than in a classroom, since there are no peers watching.

    After the Session

    Ask a simple question when they finish: “What was the most useful thing from today?” This consolidates learning, signals that you’re interested, and gives you a window into whether the sessions are working. You don’t need to quiz them — just a brief conversation that treats the learning as real and worth reflecting on.

    All Thorogood English sessions are online via Zoom — and we’re happy to do a free no-pressure trial so your child can get comfortable with the format before committing. Join the waiting list for January 2027.

  • Politeness Theory for A-Level English Language: Face and Face-Saving Acts

    Politeness theory is one of the most practically useful frameworks in A-Level English Language — not just for exams, but because it gives you a precise vocabulary for something you intuitively understand: the complicated social dance of not offending people while still communicating what you need.

    What Is “Face”?

    The concept of “face” comes originally from Erving Goffman, who used it to describe the public self-image that we present and maintain in social interactions. Brown and Levinson developed this into a theory of politeness built around two types of face:

    • Positive face: The desire to be liked, approved of, and included — our need to feel that others value us and our desires
    • Negative face: The desire for autonomy and freedom from imposition — our need not to be told what to do or have our freedom constrained

    Most communicative acts are face-threatening acts (FTAs) — they threaten either the speaker’s or the hearer’s positive or negative face. Politeness strategies are the ways speakers manage or mitigate these threats.

    The Four Politeness Strategies

    Brown and Levinson identified four strategies for performing FTAs:

    1. Bald on record: The FTA is performed directly, without mitigation (“Shut the door”). Used when efficiency matters more than politeness, or between intimates where face is not at risk.
    2. Positive politeness: Strategies that address the hearer’s desire to be liked and included — complimenting them, finding common ground, including them in a group identity (“Let’s just pop in and have a quick look, shall we?”)
    3. Negative politeness: Strategies that address the hearer’s desire for autonomy — hedging, being indirect, apologising for the imposition (“I’m sorry to bother you, but I wonder if you might possibly be able to…”)
    4. Off record: The FTA is performed indirectly, so the speaker can deny having made it — hints, implicature, rhetorical questions (“It’s quite cold in here…” to mean “close the window”)

    Applying This in Exams

    When you encounter spoken data or written interaction in a language exam, ask:

    • What face threats are present in this interaction?
    • What politeness strategies are the speakers using to manage them?
    • Why might one strategy be used rather than another? (Power, distance, size of imposition)

    Brown and Levinson propose that the strategy chosen depends on three variables: the relative power of the speakers, their social distance, and the perceived imposition of the FTA. These are worth referencing explicitly in exam responses.

    Don’t just identify the strategy — explain why it makes sense in this particular social context. That’s where the marks are.

    Politeness theory, discourse analysis, and all the major language frameworks are covered in Thorogood English’s A-Level English Language classes. Join the waiting list for January 2027.

  • How to Write an Analytical Essay Introduction for IGCSE Literature

    Most IGCSE Literature students write introductions that either restate the question, summarise the plot, or make vague general statements about the text. None of these approaches scores well. The introduction is the first impression you make on the examiner — and the place where top-band responses announce themselves immediately.

    Here’s exactly how to write an introduction that works.

    What an Introduction Must Do

    A strong IGCSE Literature introduction does three things:

    1. Engages directly with the question — not a paraphrase of it, but a response to it
    2. Establishes your overall argument (what you’re going to argue across the whole essay)
    3. Introduces the method or angle you’ll use to explore the question

    Notice what’s not on that list: plot summary, biographical information about the author, dictionary definitions, or anything that begins “In this essay I will…”.

    The Formula (to Learn and Then Break)

    A useful starting structure for students who are developing their introductions:

    [Author] uses [text] to explore [theme/idea from question] through [method/character/structural choice], suggesting that [your overall argument].

    For example, for the question “How does Shakespeare present the theme of ambition in Macbeth?”:

    Shakespeare uses Macbeth to explore ambition as a fundamentally corrupting force — not merely a character flaw but a kind of psychological unravelling, accelerated by external temptation and internal weakness. Through the play’s dramatic structure, in which Macbeth’s ascent and catastrophic decline are compressed into five acts, Shakespeare presents ambition as inseparable from destruction.

    This introduction: engages with “how” (through structure, characterisation), establishes an argument (ambition as corrupting, leading to destruction), and signals analytical rather than narrative thinking.

    Common Mistakes to Avoid

    • “In this essay I will explore…” — Never. This wastes a sentence and signals mechanical thinking.
    • “Shakespeare was born in 1564…” — The examiner knows. Biographical context belongs only if it’s directly relevant to the question, and even then, briefly.
    • Restating the question: “This essay will discuss the theme of ambition in Macbeth” — this says nothing about what you actually think.
    • Starting with a definition: “Ambition is defined as a strong desire to achieve something…” — always weak.

    The Opening Sentence

    The best openings make a confident, arguable claim — something a reader could disagree with, which means it’s actually saying something. Compare:

    Weak: “In Of Mice and Men, Steinbeck writes about loneliness.”

    Strong: “Steinbeck presents loneliness in Of Mice and Men not merely as an emotional state but as the defining condition of American working-class life in the 1930s — a structural feature of a society that offers the dream of belonging while systematically denying it.”

    The strong version makes an argument. It takes a position. The examiner wants to read on.

    Writing strong analytical essays — including introductions that signal top-band thinking immediately — is exactly what Thorogood English specialises in. Join the waiting list for January 2027 classes.

  • A-Level English Language: Language and Gender Explained

    Language and gender is one of the most debated topics in linguistics — and one of the most reliably assessed areas of A-Level English Language. It raises genuinely interesting questions: Do men and women really speak differently? If so, why? Are gender differences in language innate, learned, or constructed?

    Here’s a clear guide to the theories, the key theorists, and how to write about them effectively in exams.

    The Deficit Model (Lakoff)

    Robin Lakoff (1975) proposed that women’s language is deficient compared to men’s. She observed that women use more hedges (“I think”, “sort of”, “maybe”), tag questions (“It’s cold, isn’t it?”), empty adjectives (“divine”, “lovely”), and rising intonation in statements. On Lakoff’s account, these features reflect women’s subordinate social position — they’re linguistically less assertive, less confident, less direct.

    Criticism: Lakoff’s evidence was largely anecdotal, and her framing assumes male speech norms are superior. Later research has questioned both the empirical claims and the value judgements embedded in them.

    The Dominance Model (Zimmerman and West)

    Don Zimmerman and Candace West (1975) studied mixed-sex conversations and found that men interrupted women far more than women interrupted men. On the dominance model, language reflects and reinforces male dominance in society — men use language to maintain power, and interruptions are one mechanism for doing so.

    The Difference Model (Tannen)

    Deborah Tannen (1990) argued that men and women belong to different linguistic subcultures and use language for fundamentally different purposes. Men use language for report talk — conveying information, establishing status, solving problems. Women use language for rapport talk — building relationships, maintaining connection, sharing experience. Neither style is deficient; they’re just different, leading to systematic cross-gender misunderstanding.

    Criticism: Tannen has been accused of oversimplifying and reinforcing gender stereotypes. The difference model risks making essentialist claims about fixed male and female natures.

    The Communities of Practice Model (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet)

    Penelope Eckert and Sally McConnell-Ginet argued that gender differences in language aren’t fixed or universal — they’re constructed in specific social contexts (communities of practice). People perform gender differently in different situations, and linguistic choices are part of that performance. This connects to Butler’s notion of gender as performance rather than identity.

    In the Exam

    When analysing data involving language and gender:

    • Avoid making sweeping claims — say “this data suggests” rather than “women always…”
    • Consider whether gender is actually the relevant variable, or whether context, power, topic, or relationship might explain the patterns better
    • Use multiple theoretical frameworks — show you know more than one and can evaluate their applicability to the specific data
    • Quote specific linguistic features from the data (hedges, interruptions, topic shifts) and name them accurately

    Language and gender, along with all the major frameworks in A-Level English Language, is covered at Thorogood English. Join the waiting list for classes starting January 2027.

  • Is Online Tutoring as Effective as Face-to-Face? The Evidence

    The question parents ask most often before signing their child up for online tutoring is some version of: “But isn’t face-to-face better?” It’s an instinctive response — in-person feels more real, more direct, more human. Surely being in the same room is better than being on a screen?

    The short answer, based on both research and the experience of tutors and students who’ve worked in both modes: online tutoring is as effective as face-to-face, and in several specific respects more convenient.

    What the Research Shows

    Multiple studies since 2020 have found no significant difference in learning outcomes between online and face-to-face tuition when the quality of teaching is equivalent. The factor that matters most is not the medium but the quality of instruction, the frequency of practice, and the quality of feedback. A brilliant teacher online outperforms an adequate teacher in person — every time.

    What Online Does Particularly Well

    Shared documents: Online tutoring often involves sharing documents in real time — both teacher and student can see the same text, the teacher can annotate, highlight, and add comments as the session progresses. This is often more efficient than looking at a single physical page together.

    Written feedback: Feedback on written work happens between sessions, asynchronously. The teacher marks at their own pace and returns detailed written comments before the next session — often more thorough than marking done hurriedly in the last five minutes of a face-to-face session.

    No travel time: A session with a tutor ten minutes away involves twenty minutes of travel. A Zoom session starts at the scheduled time and ends there. For students who are tired after school or have busy schedules, this matters.

    Access to the best teachers: Online removes geography as a constraint. You’re not limited to tutors who happen to live nearby — you can work with the most qualified and experienced teacher for your child’s specific needs, wherever they are.

    What Takes Adjustment

    Some students find online tutoring slightly harder to engage with at first, particularly those who are easily distracted or who struggle with screen-based work. The habits that help — a dedicated workspace, cameras on during the session, other devices closed — make a significant difference and are worth establishing from the start.

    The Bottom Line

    Online tutoring is not a compromise version of face-to-face. It is a different mode of delivery with its own advantages, minor challenges, and a large body of evidence showing equivalent outcomes when done well. What matters is the quality of the teacher, the consistency of the practice, and the quality of the feedback — none of which require physical presence in the same room.

    Thorogood English is fully online — designed that way deliberately, so that families anywhere in the world can access excellent specialist English teaching. Join the waiting list for January 2027.

  • A-Level English Language: Child Language Acquisition Explained

    Child language acquisition — how children acquire their first language — is one of the most reliably assessed topics in A-Level English Language. It’s also one of the most genuinely interesting: the question of how any human being goes from no language to fluent communication in just a few years remains one of the most fascinating puzzles in all of linguistics.

    Here’s what you need to know — and how to write about it effectively in exams.

    The Key Theories

    Behaviourism (Skinner)

    B.F. Skinner proposed that children learn language the same way they learn any other behaviour: through imitation and reinforcement. Children imitate the speech they hear from adults; correct utterances are reinforced (praised or responded to appropriately); incorrect ones are not reinforced or are corrected. Language is, on this view, entirely learned from the environment.

    The problem: children routinely produce utterances they have never heard (“I goed to the shops”), suggesting they’re not simply imitating but applying rules. They also acquire language with remarkable speed and accuracy even without explicit instruction.

    Nativism (Chomsky)

    Noam Chomsky proposed that humans are born with an innate language acquisition device (LAD) — a built-in capacity for language that allows children to extract the grammatical rules of any language they’re exposed to. The evidence: all children acquire language in roughly the same sequence regardless of the language being learned; children acquire language at similar rates regardless of explicit teaching; and children produce systematic errors (overgeneralisation, like “goed”) that suggest they’re applying rules, not just imitating.

    Interactionism (Bruner)

    Jerome Bruner argued that neither innate capacity nor imitation alone explains acquisition — the social context of language learning matters too. He proposed the Language Acquisition Support System (LASS): the scaffolded interactions between child and caregiver (joint attention, turn-taking, the motherese or child-directed speech that adults naturally use with young children) that support language development. Language is acquired through social interaction, not just exposure.

    Key Milestones

    • Pre-linguistic stage (0–12 months): Cooing, babbling, intonation patterns. Children produce sounds before words.
    • Holophrastic stage (12–18 months): Single words used to convey whole meanings (“Milk!” can mean “I want milk”, “there is milk”, or “I spilled the milk”).
    • Two-word stage (18–24 months): Two-word combinations (“Mummy gone”, “More juice”). Grammatical function words (the, is, of) are absent — this is telegraphic speech.
    • Telegraphic stage (24–36 months): Three or more word utterances. Content words dominant; function words appearing. Systematic overgeneralisation of grammar rules (“I runned”).
    • Post-telegraphic / beyond (36 months+): Increasingly complex sentences; grammatical morphemes acquired; most grammatical rules mastered by age 5.

    Key Terms to Use Accurately

    • Overgeneralisation / overextension / underextension: Different error types at different stages
    • Virtuous errors: Systematic errors like “goed” that demonstrate rule application rather than mere imitation failure
    • Child-directed speech (CDS) / motherese: The modified speech adults use with young children — higher pitch, simplified vocabulary, shorter sentences, exaggerated intonation
    • Scaffolding: Adult support for language learning through structuring interaction appropriately to the child’s current level

    In exam responses, always connect the theoretical framework to specific evidence from any data provided. Don’t just name the theory — show how the data supports or complicates it.

    Language acquisition — along with all the other major topics in A-Level English Language — is covered in depth at Thorogood English. Join the waiting list for January 2027 classes.

  • Home Education and IGCSE English: A Complete Guide for Families

    Home education is growing rapidly in the UK and internationally, and navigating public examinations — particularly IGCSE, the qualification most commonly used by home-educated students — is one of the most common challenges families face. Here is a practical guide to everything you need to know about sitting Cambridge IGCSE English as a private candidate.

    Why IGCSE Rather Than GCSE?

    Standard GCSE exams in England are primarily designed for school-based candidates and are difficult for private candidates to access. Cambridge IGCSE is specifically designed to be internationally available to private candidates — sat through registered exam centres worldwide, marked centrally by Cambridge, and fully recognised by UK universities as equivalent to standard GCSE.

    Finding an Exam Centre

    Private candidates register through an approved Cambridge exam centre — you cannot sit directly through Cambridge without one. In the UK, a growing number of centres accept private candidates for IGCSE. The Cambridge International website has a “find a centre” tool; the Home Education Advisory Service also maintains lists of centres that work with home-educated students. Contact centres early — some have limited capacity for private candidates and fill quickly.

    Outside the UK, Cambridge exam centres exist in most countries. For families in Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UAE, international schools and registered test centres typically offer Cambridge IGCSEs and can accept private candidates.

    Exam Series and Deadlines

    Cambridge IGCSE runs two main exam series each year: May/June and October/November. English Language (0500) is typically available in both series. Registration deadlines are usually several months before the exam — often October or November for May/June sittings. Do not leave this late.

    Preparation: What Home-Educated Students Actually Need

    The most common gap for home-educated students is exam technique, not general English ability. Students can be strong readers and writers who nevertheless underperform on IGCSE because they haven’t been taught what each question type specifically requires — the precise techniques that gain marks on the summary question, the directed writing, the language analysis.

    A qualified tutor who knows the Cambridge IGCSE specifically — ideally a former examiner — provides the exam-focused teaching that textbooks alone can’t replicate. Weekly small-group sessions with individual written feedback typically produce significant improvement over a 6–12 month preparation period.

    Free Resources to Use

    • Past papers and mark schemes: Free on the Cambridge International website. Use them systematically — timed, marked against the scheme, carefully reviewed.
    • Examiner reports: Published alongside mark schemes. These tell you exactly what candidates did well and badly each year — patterns that repeat and mistakes that can be avoided.
    • Cambridge-endorsed textbooks: More useful than generic revision guides because they’re organised around the actual exam structure and question types.

    Thorogood English works with home-educated students in the UK and internationally. Jacqueline is a former Cambridge examiner whose IGCSE English groups are suitable for private candidates anywhere in the world. Join the waiting list for January 2027 — or get in touch with questions.

  • Creative Writing for 11+: What Markers Are Actually Looking For

    Many parents assume the 11+ creative writing task rewards natural storytelling gifts — that imaginative children will flourish and others will struggle, and there’s little that can be done about it. This is a misunderstanding. 11+ creative writing rewards specific, identifiable qualities that can be developed through practice. Here’s what markers are actually looking for.

    A Strong Opening

    Markers read hundreds of pieces beginning with “One day…” or “It was a bright morning…” Pieces that stand out open in the middle of something — an action, a thought, a striking image, a line of dialogue that creates immediate curiosity. Practise writing five different opening sentences for the same prompt and choose the most interesting. This habit takes minutes but makes a significant first impression.

    Specific, Concrete Detail

    “The old house was spooky” tells us almost nothing. “The third stair creaked no matter how carefully you trod, and the smell of old paper was everywhere” creates a world the reader can inhabit. Specific detail is what distinguishes memorable writing from forgettable writing at every level — and it’s a learnable skill.

    Encourage close observation as a habit: “what did it smell like? What colour exactly? What sound did it make?” Children who observe specifically write specifically.

    Varied Sentence Length

    Markers notice sentence rhythm. A piece that varies between longer, more flowing sentences and short, punchy ones reads more dynamically than one in which every sentence is roughly the same length. A very short sentence after a long one creates a pause that resonates. This is a technical skill that has a disproportionate effect on how a piece feels to read — and it can be practised deliberately.

    Accurate Punctuation

    Markers assess technical accuracy alongside creativity. Full stops and capital letters used accurately; commas in lists; speech marks correctly used for dialogue; paragraph breaks in appropriate places. A piece with strong ideas but significant punctuation errors will be marked down on accuracy regardless of its imaginative quality. These are all learnable through focused practice.

    A Deliberate Ending

    Many children run out of time or ideas before the ending — the piece just stops rather than ends. Pieces that score highly end deliberately: a final image that echoes the opening, an answered question, a resonant thought. The habit to build: before writing, know roughly how the piece will end. You don’t need every detail, but knowing your destination means you can navigate toward it rather than wandering until time runs out.

    Creative writing for 11+ is practised specifically in Thorogood English’s 11+ English groups — not assumed and not left to chance. Join the waiting list for January 2027.

  • A-Level English Literature: How to Compare Two Texts in the Exam

    Comparison questions — which ask you to compare two texts, two extracts, or a set text with an unseen passage — are some of the most intellectually demanding questions in A-Level English Literature. Many students respond to them by writing about Text A, then writing about Text B, and adding a brief paragraph at the end that says “both texts explore themes of loss.” This is not comparison. This is two separate analyses joined with a staple.

    The Core Principle: Integrate, Don’t Alternate

    True comparison happens sentence by sentence and paragraph by paragraph, not text by text. Each point you make should involve both texts simultaneously. You are not writing “In Text A… In Text B…” You are writing “Both writers render loss through imagery of natural decay, though where Keats situates this in seasonal change, Woolf locates it in the unchanged domestic detail of an abandoned room.”

    The difference is that the second version makes a genuinely comparative point — it names what is shared and immediately marks the distinction. The examiner can see the comparison happening, not just hear you promise it will happen later.

    Use Connectives That Force Comparison

    Train yourself to use at least one comparative connective in every paragraph: similarly, whereas, by contrast, both writers, unlike, on the other hand, this idea is developed/subverted/complicated in… If you find yourself writing a paragraph with no connective linking both texts, you are describing rather than comparing.

    Three Structural Approaches

    Point-by-point (recommended): Each paragraph makes one comparative point that covers both texts. Most sophisticated — produces genuinely integrated comparison. Best when texts have clear points of connection.

    Block with embedded comparison: Write primarily about Text A with constant reference to Text B, then reverse. Works if texts are very different in nature; risks drifting into separate analysis unless you consciously sustain the cross-referencing.

    Thematic: Organise by idea rather than text, both texts discussed under each theme. Very strong if done well, but requires confident advance planning.

    What Genuine Comparison Produces

    The strongest comparative essays do more than list similarities and differences — they use the comparison to produce insight that neither text alone would yield. If you could remove one text from your essay and it would still make sense as a response about the remaining text, you have not achieved genuine comparison. A comparison should illuminate something about both texts that becomes visible only when they are placed alongside each other.

    Essay technique is taught in depth at Thorogood English’s A-Level classes. Join the waiting list for January 2027.

  • How to Use Cambridge IGCSE Past Papers Effectively

    Cambridge IGCSE past papers are one of the best revision resources available — and they’re free. Cambridge publishes papers, mark schemes, and examiner reports for most IGCSE subjects going back several years. Yet many students use them badly — rushing through papers without reviewing them, or treating them as a performance check rather than a learning tool.

    Here’s how to use them properly.

    Where to Find Them

    The Cambridge International website provides past papers and mark schemes for free. Search “Cambridge IGCSE English Language past papers” and you’ll find resources going back at least five years for most exam sessions. Make sure you’re using the right variant — Cambridge IGCSE English Language 0500 is the most common, but there’s also 0990 (a different version) — and the right exam session (May/June or October/November, depending on when your child sits).

    Do the Paper Under Real Conditions First

    Before you look at the mark scheme, do the paper. This is essential — the value of a past paper comes from genuine practice, not reading it while simultaneously checking what the right answers are. Sit somewhere quiet, time yourself accurately, and work through the paper as if it were the real exam.

    This means no notes, no help, no pausing the clock. The time pressure is a significant part of what the exam tests, and students who practise without it are practising something different from the real exam.

    Mark It Yourself — Carefully

    Mark your own paper against the mark scheme, but do it properly. The Cambridge mark scheme for English includes descriptors for different mark ranges, not just a list of right answers — because English often has multiple valid responses. Read the descriptors for each question and assess honestly which band your response falls into and why.

    This process of self-assessment is itself valuable — it trains the metacognitive skill of being able to evaluate your own work against the standard, which is exactly what you need to do in the exam to check and improve your answers before submission.

    Read the Examiner Report

    Cambridge publishes an Examiner Report for each paper — a document in which senior examiners describe what candidates did well, what common mistakes occurred, and what distinguished high-scoring responses from weaker ones. These reports are extraordinarily useful and almost nobody reads them.

    The examiner report tells you exactly what the examiners found frustrating about that year’s responses — and these patterns repeat year on year. If the 2022 examiner report says “too many candidates copied directly from the source text in the summary question,” that’s a mistake to avoid. If it says “stronger responses offered a specific explanation of the effect of the language choice rather than simply naming the technique,” that’s direct guidance on what a high-scoring answer looks like.

    Don’t Do Papers in Chronological Order

    Use the most recent papers last — save them for timed practice closest to the exam, when your skills are most developed and the practice most closely resembles real conditions. Use older papers earlier, when you can afford to approach them with less urgency and more attention to review and learning.

    Vary Your Use

    Not every past paper needs to be done as a full timed paper. You can use individual questions for targeted practice — doing ten summary questions from ten different papers is very efficient practice for summary specifically. You can use reading sections as analytical reading practice, without doing the questions at all. You can use directed writing prompts as standalone writing exercises. The papers are versatile resources; you don’t have to use them only one way.

    At Thorogood English, past papers are used systematically throughout the IGCSE English course — done under conditions, marked carefully, and followed up with individual feedback. Join the waiting list for January 2027 classes.